©CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
🚩加入 Nostr!moe 社区: join.nostr.moe
🚩加入 Nostr!moe 社区: join.nostr.moe
#吐槽
In reply to nevent1q…nxhq
_________________________
直接回滚更新不就行了, 这种问题在 Windows 很常见了.
via Nostr@cxplay
In reply to nevent1q…nxhq
_________________________
直接回滚更新不就行了, 这种问题在 Windows 很常见了.
via Nostr@cxplay
#吐槽
用 Nostr 协议实现的 Torrent 索引器, 很不错的想法.
via Nostr@cxplay
用 Nostr 协议实现的 Torrent 索引器, 很不错的想法.
quoting nevent1q…lruy
Src: https://git.v0l.io/Kieran/dtan
via Nostr@cxplay
维护公告出了: https://www.pixiv.net/info.php?id=10322
但是我发现今天发的 26 号的排行榜也有点问题, 首次登陆作品和 25 号的榜单重叠了, 导致 26 号榜单的结果数量已经超出常规水平一倍多了.
quoting nevent1q…cn96
第一次见到 pixiv 的排行榜出问题, 25 号排行榜里面有什么?
https://twitter.com/pixiv/status/1728954225156030950
via Nostr@cxplay
#吐槽
In reply to nevent1q…fwcr
_________________________
You're actually the one shifting the topic. It seems like you enjoy arrogantly expressing political views and ideologies. If that's how you treat others, then I'm sorry. Goodbye! 👋
PS: Stop fxxking replying to me, I feel disgusted.
via Nostr@cxplay
In reply to nevent1q…fwcr
_________________________
You're actually the one shifting the topic. It seems like you enjoy arrogantly expressing political views and ideologies. If that's how you treat others, then I'm sorry. Goodbye! 👋
PS: Stop fxxking replying to me, I feel disgusted.
via Nostr@cxplay
In reply to nevent1q…ek6a
_________________________
然而其实就是基本模式, 快速模式反而还没有出现过内存泄漏.
另外还注意到好像没办法通过 nostr.wine 的客户端验证?
via Nostr@cxplay
第一次见到 pixiv 的排行榜出问题, 25 号排行榜里面有什么?
https://twitter.com/pixiv/status/1728954225156030950
via Nostr@cxplay
#吐槽
In reply to nevent1q…arhm
_________________________
What made you have the hallucination that "Xiaohongshu users are all illiterate"? Have you personally used it? Why do you compare WeChat and Xiaohongshu? They are completely different products, targeting different user groups. If you think WeChat has only developed to its current state through mobile payments alone, then you are completely mistaken.
I suggest that you abandon your belief in WeChat and instead listen to the thoughts of young people in China. Young individuals tend to dislike clichés and platitudes.
via Nostr@cxplay
In reply to nevent1q…arhm
_________________________
What made you have the hallucination that "Xiaohongshu users are all illiterate"? Have you personally used it? Why do you compare WeChat and Xiaohongshu? They are completely different products, targeting different user groups. If you think WeChat has only developed to its current state through mobile payments alone, then you are completely mistaken.
I suggest that you abandon your belief in WeChat and instead listen to the thoughts of young people in China. Young individuals tend to dislike clichés and platitudes.
via Nostr@cxplay
#吐槽
In reply to nevent1q…u6cu
_________________________
小红书(Xiaohongshu) is just a closed social media platform, no different from Twitter today. It cannot even be searched using traditional search engines such as Baidu (China's Google equivalent) to retrieve its content. It also lacks the strong interoperability and protocol-level openness of platforms like Fediverse and Nostr (just as Twitter and Reddit are becoming less open today). Since its inception, Xiaohongshu has never intended to easily share its internal user data with others. This user data is its most valuable asset, known as "私域流量(private domain traffic)".
Its success in China is undeniable. Even if Chinese young people do not use Xiaohongshu, they know what it is because it is as popular in China as TikTok, Reddit and Twitter. Of course, the Little Red Book is criticised by just as many people for being "brainwashing", in the same way that most people treat TikTok, depending on how you use it.
By the way, Chinese young people don't like 微信(WeChat). Most young people only use it because they "have to", as because it's everywhere in real life, whether it's for socialising or mobile payments. Just because they don't have a choice doesn't mean they like it.
via Nostr@cxplay
In reply to nevent1q…u6cu
_________________________
小红书(Xiaohongshu) is just a closed social media platform, no different from Twitter today. It cannot even be searched using traditional search engines such as Baidu (China's Google equivalent) to retrieve its content. It also lacks the strong interoperability and protocol-level openness of platforms like Fediverse and Nostr (just as Twitter and Reddit are becoming less open today). Since its inception, Xiaohongshu has never intended to easily share its internal user data with others. This user data is its most valuable asset, known as "私域流量(private domain traffic)".
Its success in China is undeniable. Even if Chinese young people do not use Xiaohongshu, they know what it is because it is as popular in China as TikTok, Reddit and Twitter. Of course, the Little Red Book is criticised by just as many people for being "brainwashing", in the same way that most people treat TikTok, depending on how you use it.
By the way, Chinese young people don't like 微信(WeChat). Most young people only use it because they "have to", as because it's everywhere in real life, whether it's for socialising or mobile payments. Just because they don't have a choice doesn't mean they like it.
via Nostr@cxplay
#吐槽
In reply to nevent1q…dj7z
_________________________
确实, 现在 Amber 上要新加一个账户进行授权, 那请求弹出都点不过来(特别是中继器发给客户端的 NIP-42 临时验证), 慢一点客户端这边只好全部默认失败或认为是被拒绝了...
或者也可以提前像 Android 系统权限授权那样提前要求进行授权? 比如 NIP-42 的签署授权.
via Nostr@cxplay
In reply to nevent1q…dj7z
_________________________
确实, 现在 Amber 上要新加一个账户进行授权, 那请求弹出都点不过来(特别是中继器发给客户端的 NIP-42 临时验证), 慢一点客户端这边只好全部默认失败或认为是被拒绝了...
或者也可以提前像 Android 系统权限授权那样提前要求进行授权? 比如 NIP-42 的签署授权.
via Nostr@cxplay
#吐槽
In reply to nevent1q…0jzn
_________________________
看完了, 是个很好的解决办法, 但能迁移的东西只有关注者, 这和 ActivityPub 的账户迁移差不多(但更激进). 我在想那些那些被私钥签名或者公钥标识后绑定的徽章(NIP-58), 中继, 列表(NIP-51)和其他的 NIP-01 怎么办. 作为亡羊补牢的办法还算不错.
NIP-46 比起事后迁移更加主动, 还是值得继续讨论的, 至少 GPG 真的用这种办法预防了主私钥泄露.
via Nostr@cxplay
In reply to nevent1q…0jzn
_________________________
看完了, 是个很好的解决办法, 但能迁移的东西只有关注者, 这和 ActivityPub 的账户迁移差不多(但更激进). 我在想那些那些被私钥签名或者公钥标识后绑定的徽章(NIP-58), 中继, 列表(NIP-51)和其他的 NIP-01 怎么办. 作为亡羊补牢的办法还算不错.
NIP-46 比起事后迁移更加主动, 还是值得继续讨论的, 至少 GPG 真的用这种办法预防了主私钥泄露.
via Nostr@cxplay
#吐槽
In reply to nevent1q…mftc
_________________________
在移动设备上现在也有本地的秘钥管理器, 比如 Amethyst 支持的 Amber: https://github.com/greenart7c3/amber (希望 Nostrmo 也能支持一下)
另外一种是直接在保存了私钥的客户端里内置浏览器(或者本身就是个浏览器), 让客户端起到 NIP-07 的能力, 比如 Nostr.band 的 Spring(https://spring.site/).
via Nostr@cxplay
In reply to nevent1q…mftc
_________________________
在移动设备上现在也有本地的秘钥管理器, 比如 Amethyst 支持的 Amber: https://github.com/greenart7c3/amber (希望 Nostrmo 也能支持一下)
另外一种是直接在保存了私钥的客户端里内置浏览器(或者本身就是个浏览器), 让客户端起到 NIP-07 的能力, 比如 Nostr.band 的 Spring(https://spring.site/).
via Nostr@cxplay
#吐槽
In reply to nevent1q…r3a0
_________________________
我觉得几乎是无法迁移的, 除非用类似 kind-5 的功能来标记账户, 还要让他做到替代跳转的墓碑功能.
via Nostr@cxplay
In reply to nevent1q…r3a0
_________________________
我觉得几乎是无法迁移的, 除非用类似 kind-5 的功能来标记账户, 还要让他做到替代跳转的墓碑功能.
via Nostr@cxplay
#吐槽
NIP-26: 委托签署事件
这个 NIP 定义了一种委托人和被委托人的密钥对关系, 可以做到类似 GPG 那样签署子密钥代表主秘钥进行专门和限时的行动. 减少使用主秘钥就直接降低的主密钥被攻击的概率, 甚至还能完全禁止子密钥签署发布特定类型的事件, 比如可以禁止发布 kind:5 的删除事件防止被失误操作和钓鱼攻击发布无法挽回的删除事件.
目前只有看到 Gossip 支持了这个 NIP, 但是要手写 JSON. 现在应用更广泛的做法还是用浏览器扩展和移动密钥管理器来保护私钥和签署事件, 未来可能还有远程签署(NIP-46).
via Nostr@cxplay
NIP-26: 委托签署事件
这个 NIP 定义了一种委托人和被委托人的密钥对关系, 可以做到类似 GPG 那样签署子密钥代表主秘钥进行专门和限时的行动. 减少使用主秘钥就直接降低的主密钥被攻击的概率, 甚至还能完全禁止子密钥签署发布特定类型的事件, 比如可以禁止发布 kind:5 的删除事件防止被失误操作和钓鱼攻击发布无法挽回的删除事件.
目前只有看到 Gossip 支持了这个 NIP, 但是要手写 JSON. 现在应用更广泛的做法还是用浏览器扩展和移动密钥管理器来保护私钥和签署事件, 未来可能还有远程签署(NIP-46).
quoting nevent1q…jc9p
这个问题我记得有一些讨论,是类似于提前备好多个key,然后用主key签名一个事件声明如果泄露就迁徙到第二个key,等真正泄露的时候就使用第二个key。讨论应该是在nip 仓库的 issue还是pr里面
via Nostr@cxplay