#吐槽
Brave 浏览器要推出一个独立的 Origin 版本构建. 也就是不包含赞助商推广, Reward, VPN, Web3 钱包和 Leo AI 的 Brave 精简版, 也不收集遥测数据.
价格一开始[1]说可能是月费制, 现在[2] Brendan Eich 再次提及说 Linux 平台将会免费, 其他平台是一次性付费.
[1]: https://x.com/BrendanEich/status/1948500509570023575
[2]: https://x.com/BrendanEich/status/2006412918783619455
via Nostr@cxplay
Brave 浏览器要推出一个独立的 Origin 版本构建. 也就是不包含赞助商推广, Reward, VPN, Web3 钱包和 Leo AI 的 Brave 精简版, 也不收集遥测数据.
价格一开始[1]说可能是月费制, 现在[2] Brendan Eich 再次提及说 Linux 平台将会免费, 其他平台是一次性付费.
[1]: https://x.com/BrendanEich/status/1948500509570023575
[2]: https://x.com/BrendanEich/status/2006412918783619455
via Nostr@cxplay
#吐槽
产品力不行改名也没用.jpg
GitHub —> CopilotHub
LinkedIn —> Copilot Unemployed
Xbox —> XCopilot
Teams —> CopilotSkype
Azure —> CopilotCloud
OneDrive —> CopilotDeleteurfiles
Edge —> CopilotExplorer
VSCode —> CopilotCursor
Bing —> Copilot4cucks
Defender —> CopilotNoViruses
Intune —> CopilotMalware
Windows —> CopilOS
Authenticator —> CopiletMeIn
Bethesda —> CopilotSkyrim
Activision —> Copilot of Duty
Task Manager —> CopilotDavePlummerWroteTaksManager
Powershell —> CopilotNotBash
Hyper-V —> Copilotrash
WSL —> Copilubuntu
Copilot —> CopilotCopilot
Minecraft —> MineCopilot
Surface —> CopiPad
Flight Simulator —> Copilot Planes Flight
https://mastodon.social/@Tutanota/115847256774525577
via Nostr@cxplay
产品力不行改名也没用.jpg
GitHub —> CopilotHub
LinkedIn —> Copilot Unemployed
Xbox —> XCopilot
Teams —> CopilotSkype
Azure —> CopilotCloud
OneDrive —> CopilotDeleteurfiles
Edge —> CopilotExplorer
VSCode —> CopilotCursor
Bing —> Copilot4cucks
Defender —> CopilotNoViruses
Intune —> CopilotMalware
Windows —> CopilOS
Authenticator —> CopiletMeIn
Bethesda —> CopilotSkyrim
Activision —> Copilot of Duty
Task Manager —> CopilotDavePlummerWroteTaksManager
Powershell —> CopilotNotBash
Hyper-V —> Copilotrash
WSL —> Copilubuntu
Copilot —> CopilotCopilot
Minecraft —> MineCopilot
Surface —> CopiPad
Flight Simulator —> Copilot Planes Flight
https://mastodon.social/@Tutanota/115847256774525577
via Nostr@cxplay
#吐槽
Anna's Archive lost their .org domain, and some people suggested that Anna's Archive use Nostr instead of Wikipedia to publish the latest domain list.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46497639
via Nostr@cxplay
Anna's Archive lost their .org domain, and some people suggested that Anna's Archive use Nostr instead of Wikipedia to publish the latest domain list.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46497639
via Nostr@cxplay
#吐槽
In reply to nevent1q…h4am
_________________________
At least we've consolidated multiple failure points into one, which alleviates a lot of pressure. In the future, perhaps we can check the status code of the njump instance before redirecting to avoid jumping to an instance that's already been downgraded.
via Nostr@cxplay
In reply to nevent1q…h4am
_________________________
At least we've consolidated multiple failure points into one, which alleviates a lot of pressure. In the future, perhaps we can check the status code of the njump instance before redirecting to avoid jumping to an instance that's already been downgraded.
via Nostr@cxplay
In reply to nevent1q…t9ry
_________________________
But njump.to has been down... Have we created another single point of failure?
via Nostr@cxplay
让 Gemini 标注了一张最新的多元性别骄傲旗帜(2021 年版本), 以免我哪天又忘记这些颜色的含义.
我在问我自己, 我何时需要为我的性别(生理与精神)认同表达立场? 挂在旗杆上和文字里的旗帜到底是 people flag 还是 country flag?
via Nostr@cxplay
呃呃原来是换了个 damus[.]live 域名继续骗 😅 cc: scamalert (npub13pp…fflu)
quoting
nevent1q…0g9d
damus.network looks to have been taken down
via Nostr@cxplay
#吐槽
In reply to nevent1q…vz47
_________________________
Bridgy Fed's Nostr Bridge is under active development, and much of the groundwork has been completed.
via Nostr@cxplay
In reply to nevent1q…vz47
_________________________
Bridgy Fed's Nostr Bridge is under active development, and much of the groundwork has been completed.
quoting
nevent1q…mhax
Launch Nostr · Issue #2215 · snarfed/bridgy-fed
https://github.com/snarfed/bridgy-fed/issues/2215
via Nostr@cxplay
#吐槽
Launch Nostr · Issue #2215 · snarfed/bridgy-fed
https://github.com/snarfed/bridgy-fed/issues/2215
via Nostr@cxplay
Launch Nostr · Issue #2215 · snarfed/bridgy-fed
https://github.com/snarfed/bridgy-fed/issues/2215
via Nostr@cxplay
#吐槽
In reply to nevent1q…0dqr
_________________________
这么快就用上 avif 了
via Nostr@cxplay
In reply to nevent1q…0dqr
_________________________
这么快就用上 avif 了
via Nostr@cxplay
Joomaen (npub1wl…74qq0)
Short Text Note by Joomaen
让ChatGPT画了个logo
🖼️️
🖼️️
#吐槽
In reply to nevent1q…7286
_________________________
Proton's services function well enough; it was essentially designed as an alternative to Google Apps, though it remains another "walled garden". The real problem lies in the communities built around Proton, and even more so with the later entrant Tuta. These communities attract large numbers of anti-bigtech giant activists and extreme privacy enthusiasts. Proton and Tuta leverage these aspects for marketing and attention, while these communities actively spread anxiety to other areas. In contrast, Apple offers similar services without needing such flashy marketing tactics or viral communities to capture this niche market. Proton and Tuta also exaggerate the benefits of "encryption" while selectively ignoring vendor lock-in issues and the question of "where keys reside". Most of the time, they simply create a trust black box for users, much like Apple does. They further choose to open-source their client applications to earn the "open-source trust" label, continuing to leverage this extensively in their marketing.
Ultimately, my view is this: encrypted email is a lie, though this reflects inherent limitations of email itself. To deliver encrypted email, Proton and Tuta essentially reinvented a proprietary communication protocol that only functions within their own servers, creating yet another black box.
via Nostr@cxplay
In reply to nevent1q…7286
_________________________
Proton's services function well enough; it was essentially designed as an alternative to Google Apps, though it remains another "walled garden". The real problem lies in the communities built around Proton, and even more so with the later entrant Tuta. These communities attract large numbers of anti-bigtech giant activists and extreme privacy enthusiasts. Proton and Tuta leverage these aspects for marketing and attention, while these communities actively spread anxiety to other areas. In contrast, Apple offers similar services without needing such flashy marketing tactics or viral communities to capture this niche market. Proton and Tuta also exaggerate the benefits of "encryption" while selectively ignoring vendor lock-in issues and the question of "where keys reside". Most of the time, they simply create a trust black box for users, much like Apple does. They further choose to open-source their client applications to earn the "open-source trust" label, continuing to leverage this extensively in their marketing.
Ultimately, my view is this: encrypted email is a lie, though this reflects inherent limitations of email itself. To deliver encrypted email, Proton and Tuta essentially reinvented a proprietary communication protocol that only functions within their own servers, creating yet another black box.
via Nostr@cxplay
