©CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
🚩加入 Nostr!moe 社区: join.nostr.moe
#吐槽

网易云, 这张专辑全网发行都只有 CD 质量, 你自己下的最高档也是 CD 质量, 那你的 "高清母带" 是哪来的? 比QQ音乐还独家?

via Nostr@cxplay
#吐槽

In reply to nevent1q…n3az
_________________________

The fact is that everyone on Nostr has no control over their messages not being broadcast to specific relays, and a high barrier to entry raises the cost to spammers while also raising the overhead of joining the network. I hate spam too, but I don't think they're to blame for spam, you should figure out a better way to judge human and bot, or userbot. Just money? not enough.

via Nostr@cxplay
#吐槽

In reply to nevent1q…lv8l
_________________________

Instead of sending Zap ads to random posts, you should try marketing that leaves a positive impression on your customers. The hardest part of a new relay service is building initial impressions, people have a lot of choices, and you're up against strong competitors like nostr.wine.

via Nostr@cxplay
#吐槽

Gentlemen, the money you're paying me is not enough to cover the price of your services. Stop this advertising crap. eggstr (npub196y…m0v9)JellyFish (npub1hu4…c46u)

via Nostr@cxplay
#article #read

域名 DNS.com 被以 1448 万人民币的价格出售给香港巨网

2023 年, 原持有者厦门帝恩思自我估值域名价格为 63 万人民币, 经过深圳中联资产评估后最终价值抬升至 1448 万, 相比最初的估值增长接近 23 倍. 出售公告发布于 2025 年 1 月 27 日, 同日完成了股东大会表决.

厦门帝恩思科技股份有限公司出售资产的公告 (2025-006)
https://web.archive.org/web/20250331122507/https://www.neeq.cc/disclosure/2025/2025-01-27/edb48cd9d5fb48f8b46fc01692f3bd65.pdf

关于dns.com变更为【51dns.com】的公告-帝恩思
https://www.51dns.com/news/4268.html

#域名

via Nostr@cxplay_clip
跳过 Windows 11 OOBE 阶段的新方法

1. 安装进入设置引导页面, 在到达网络设置前通过 Shift + F10 或 Ctrl + Shift + J 启动命令行.
2. 输入命令 start ms-cxh:localonlyWinJS.Application.restart("ms-cxh://LOCALONLY") 回车执行.
3. 弹出本地账户添加窗口, 添加本地账户后将直接进入系统初始化, 结束后直接进入桌面.

Twitter@witherornot1337
the-P1neapple/WinJS-Microsoft-Account-Bypass

#Windows

via CXPLAY's Memos
#吐槽

Decentralization is the opposite of "private", and Nostr alone has no way of controlling that an event isn't broadcast to other relays, and no way of dynamically controlling who can see the content. There is no way to dynamically control who can see the content unless it is effectively locked to a range of servers or DRM is implemented, but that is not decentralization.

On the Fediverse side, "private" or locked accounts are simply not allowed to be followed by two-way consent, the content is still public. To be truly "private", the content must be disconnected from Fediverse and locked to a specific server.

Unless we can encrypt the content in advance for each audience and then make it public, but again if the content is always replicated indefinitely in the Fediverse or Nostr, then this will not achieve forward secrecy.
quoting
nevent1q…pvth
Meanwhile on Nostr, or "private Nostr" as jb55 (npub1xts…kk5s) once called it, we have a little bit of make-believe technology, but with better incentives, less blast radius and much more reliable and fine-grained implementations that give us actually much better chances of things working -- and yet hodlbod (npub1jlr…ynqn) thinks it's not enough and wants to run pure encryption functions on all the notes and make everybody's lives miserable for no gain because in the end screenshots still exist and are effectful, negating his purism.


via Nostr@cxplay
#吐槽

In reply to nevent1q…jy52
_________________________

This sounds like using an RSS feed, which is always a unilaterally agreed upon follow. Private accounts may be an implementation of robots.txt in Fediverse.

via Nostr@cxplay
Back to Top