©CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

频道: cx.ms/channel
笔记: cx.ms/memo
博客: cx.ms/blog
剪贴: cx.ms/clip
社交: cx.ms/sns
#吐槽

In reply to nevent1q…7nf8
_________________________

居然通过了, 昨晚的 lain.la 结果不是很理想, 现在都没有消息从 bridge 中继发过来.

via Nostr@cxplay Short Text Note by CXPLAY (reply)
#吐槽

...
First of all, congrats! Your business must have become pretty successful. How exactly did CF decide to “ask” you to switch to Enterprise?
Maybe...

- you hit 10TB of traffic per month
- their lava lamps went into a specific astral alignment
- a sales rep realized that they haven't hit their quarterly quota yet
...

有趣.

----------------------
Jimmy(@jimyhuang@g0v.social) says:

Cloudflare 鬼故事又一樁,原始貼文下面留言也滿值得看

Cloudflare took down our website after trying to force us to pay 120k$ within 24h
https://robindev.substack.com/p/cloudflare-took-down-our-website

Hacker news 上討論就有點雜
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40481808

via CXPLAY (@[email protected])
#吐槽

@[email protected] 日本人: 这里有柠檬欸.

----------------------
明日过后(@xixiye@m.cmx.im) says:

身为一个资深东亚人,在给予对方否定回答时,我总会习惯性加一个前缀“不好意思,不行,办不了,不可以。”
现在我觉悟了,不加任何客气前缀,什么不好意思抱歉啥的,统统没必要,就直接no。
不不不,NONONO,理直气壮。

via CXPLAY (@[email protected])
#吐槽

In reply to nevent1q…943e
_________________________

出版物要修改内容几乎只能修订后再版. 但是一些特种出版物, 比如航运界常用的英国水道测量局出版供全世界远洋航运使用的世界大洋航路, 航路设计图, 航路指南和潮汐表等图书都是会定期修改内容的, 但主要方法不是修订后再版, 而是定期发布修订通告, 然后让图书实际使用的船队对应职员负责修改图书.
但是这些可以增补的特种书籍内容都不会使用网页链接, 最多的只是给一个海事的官网域名.
PS: 要避免 Link Rot, 那最好的办法是不是就是不直接引用链接... 互联网又又又 "死亡" 了.

via Nostr@cxplay Short Text Note by CXPLAY
#吐槽

In reply to nevent1q…9w0c
_________________________

真的稀有, 大多数都是 Mastodon. 各种各样的 "象" 和 "mstd" 关键词. 但还是找到了一个独特的小实例: kazv.moe, 不过感觉不会通过注册审核:eveonecat_sleep:. 于是去 lain.la 上又注册了一个.

via Nostr@cxplay
#吐槽

@[email protected] 当学生的时候也是这样, 找不到学习的意义在哪, 大人只会给虚无缥缈的宏大叙事, 同龄人也和我一样不关心(也不知道), 完全想象不到 "考上大学就好了" 是什么样子, 自己只是有「家里人看着那些数字很开心的话也许会对我好一点」的这种经验. 直到自己找到属于自己的目的, 精神世界不再需要依赖别人, 于是这种自尊索取关系立马就被打破了.
现在想起真是可笑的童年时代.

----------------------
煮杏为酪(@fattyrabbit@o3o.ca) replies:

因为胖的时候好痛苦,身边朋友同学从没觉得我胖,但被家人明里暗里嘲笑还总让我少吃点,瘦了之后被他们夸的时候才觉得找到了自尊 ​:ablobhologram:

----------------------
煮杏为酪(@fattyrabbit@o3o.ca) says:

其实也知道自己看着不胖,但还是陷入了体重焦虑…

via CXPLAY (@[email protected])
#吐槽

In reply to nevent1q…q9hd
_________________________

仿佛一群人对着 Google Search 这个黑盒不断输入来记录输出规律最后得出 SEO 技术, 然后 Google 突然把这个盒子打开了一条缝, 外面的人看到了一些管道的走向, 有些正好和长期以来的 SEO 理论不谋而合, 甚至相符到有人开始怀疑 Google 是故意泄露, 甚至整个文档都是假的.
但实际上, 我觉得就算要生编出这两千五百个模块和一万四千个属性也要花很多时间, 并且还不能让人发现其中的逻辑错误, 就算是 AIGC, 也得花很多人力和时间来复核. 真算假的, 那也是炒作和假新闻里面质量很高的了, 比 Yandex 源代码泄露那次给出的信息更有用.

Google 发言人的出发点是好的, 但我们能相信他们吗?
> 快速的答案是, 当你太接近核心秘密时就不能了.

via Nostr@cxplay
#article #read

In reply to nevent1q…t472
_________________________

Secrets from the Algorithm: Google Search’s Internal Engineering Documentation Has Leaked

...
An important thing we can all take away from this is: SEOs know what they are doing. After years of being told we’re wrong it’s good to see behind the curtain and find out we have been right all along. And, while there are interesting nuances of how Google works in these documents there is nothing that is going to make dramatically change course in how I strategically do SEO.
For those that dig in, these documents will primarily serve to validate what seasoned SEOs have long advocated. Understand your audience, identify what they want, make the best thing possible that aligns with that, make it technically accessible, and promote it until it ranks.
To everyone in SEO that has been unsure of what they are doing, keep testing, keep learning, and keep growing businesses. Google can’t do what they do without us.
...
—— https://ipullrank.com/google-algo-leak / https://archive.ph/tBVGt

via Nostr@cxplay_clip Short Text Note by CXPLAY (reply)
#article #read

In reply to nevent1q…xtyy
_________________________

TL;DR KEY TAKEAWAYS:
- Google claimed they don't use a "domain authority" metric, but the docs show they totally do - it's called "siteAuthority."
- G said clicks don't affect rankings, but there's a whole system called "NavBoost" that uses click data to change search results.
- Google denied having a "sandbox" that holds back new sites, but yep, the docs confirm it exists.
- G assured us Chrome data isn't used for ranking, but surprise! It is.
- The number and diversity of your backlinks still matter a lot.
- Having authors with expertise and authority helps.
- Putting keywords in your title tag and matching search queries is important.
- Google tracks the dates on your pages to determine freshness.
- A lot of long-held SEO theories have been validated, so trust your instincts.
- Creating great content and promoting it well is still the best approach.
- We should experiment more to see what works, rather than just listening to what Google says.
—— https://www.reddit.com/r/SEO/comments/1d2gllz/comment/l60i5zl/

via Nostr@cxplay_clip
#吐槽

In reply to nevent1q…dr0x
_________________________

Google 你是故意的还是不小心的? 怎么刚宣布调整 SEO 算法就把旧文档泄露了?

via Nostr@cxplay Short Text Note by CXPLAY (reply)
#吐槽

@[email protected] 编剧: 不看我写的阳春白雪的玩家只能渡过一个相对失败的人生, 总之你们开发组的不准加跳过.

----------------------
墨原(@ncts@dabr.ca) says:

怎么有游戏普通对话都给了跳过剧情对话不给跳过……觉得你那两句词写得很出彩玩家没有权力不看是吧

via CXPLAY (@[email protected])
#吐槽

In reply to nevent1q…8n2l
_________________________

说错了, njump 的 kind:30023 不是前端渲染. 只是 RSS Feed 输出的时候只会用正则做简单的换行符和转义符号替换, 再加上上下文超链接. 不会和网页预览 kind:30023 那样经过 Markdown 解析后渲染成为 HTML, RSS/Atom 由于本来没有设计长文本内容输出, 也就缺少了这一步. 或许可以让 kind:30023 和网页预览一样共用这个步骤?

via Nostr@cxplay
#吐槽

In reply to nevent1q…c78h
_________________________

PoW 从加密货币兴起, 于是 Nostr 里面也有类似的做法:
> https://nips.nostr.com/13
比起各种 WAF, 花里胡哨的人机验证码, PoW 直接硬性消耗算力算 hash, 要在网络上做的步数越多, 消耗的算力越大, 可以有效缓解大规模的滥用. Nostr 引入 PoW 目的当然也是为了对抗滥用, 虽然最后看起来和挖矿没有什么区别, 但这实际上不会产生任何直接实际收益.
PS: 什么叫边缘计算啊? (后仰)

via Nostr@cxplay Short Text Note by CXPLAY's Clip
#article #read

ChatGPT开始上PoW了 - 常规话题 / 人工智能 - LINUX DO
- https://linux.do/t/topic/61502
- https://archive.ph/9RSzp

最近又开始挖矿潮了还是什么,做高性能大鸡的商家订单爆了 - Nodeseek
> chatgpt的官网,为了防止别人逆向去卖,增加了pow验证机制。需要用cpu算力跑验证,然后才能正常的在chatgpt官网对话。于是国内做chatgpt逆向的就需要大量的cpu算力。。。
> 只需要cpu,不需要内存不需要硬盘,所以当然是可以跑满cpu的vds性价比最高
- https://www.nodeseek.com/post-114638-1#7
- https://archive.ph/nHrjG#7

via Nostr@cxplay_clip
#吐槽

到底是「道反天罡」还是「倒反天罡」?
百度汉语只有「道反天罡」而没有「倒反天罡」词条, 看搜索结果「倒反天罡」反而更像网络流行语了, 含义似乎是很接近的.

via Nostr@cxplay Short Text Note by CXPLAY
Back to Top